APVS 2017
Comparison efficacy of Type I and Type II PRRS vaccine in Thai commercial farm
- 10 minutes
- Expertise article | APVS 2017
- N Duangwhae, P Phoomiwattananon, C Maala
The results of this study demonstrated poor efficacy performance using Type I vaccine in the farm positive for PRRSV type II compared to a VR2332 based vaccine.
Efficacy of vaccination of Ingelvac® PRRS MLV in pigs in Japanese farrow-to-finish farm
- 10 minutes
- Expertise article | APVS 2017
- H Ishikawa, Y Watanabe, Y Kazuno, S Ishizeki
The key of succession of PRRS vaccination is that confirming by monitoring that there is no vertical/horizontal transmission of PRRS virus before weaning and when the field exposure of PRRS virus was occurred
Effect of Ingelvac® PRRS MLV on boar semen quality in an endemic farm
- 10 minutes
- Expertise article | APVS 2017
- Z.H. Cheah, E. Cheah, P.Q. Lim, C.K. Yong, K.Y. Kam. APVS. 2017
Based on this field experiment, we can conclude that Ingelvac PRRS MLV is safe to use in PRRS-positive boar.
Impact of stopping PRRS MLV vaccination in piglets in a malaysian farm
- 10 minutes
- Expertise article | APVS 2017
- E. Cheah, Z.H. Cheah, K.Y. Kam, C.K. Yong, E. Lim. APVS. 2017
All in all, a long term whole herd PRRS MLV vaccination approach is vital to reduce the losses in the farm due to PRRS infection.
Don’t miss any news on PRRS disease control Subscribe now to PRRS.com newsletter